国际米兰对阵科莫 - Bar-Ilan University /taxonomy/external-affiliations/bar-ilan-university en Females perform better than males on a 鈥榯heory of mind鈥 test across 57 countries /research/news/females-perform-better-than-males-on-a-theory-of-mind-test-across-57-countries <div class="field field-name-field-news-image field-type-image field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><img class="cam-scale-with-grid" src="/sites/default/files/styles/content-580x288/public/news/research/news/yuri-levin-paaakl05ldm-unsplash.jpg?itok=oM3rNs4r" alt="Two women hugging" title="Two women hugging, Credit: Yuri Levin (Unsplash)" /></div></div></div><div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Researchers found that females, on average, score higher than males on the widely used 鈥楻eading the Mind in the Eyes鈥 Test, which measures 鈥榯heory of mind鈥 (also known as 鈥榗ognitive empathy鈥). This finding was observed across all ages and most countries.</p>&#13; &#13; <p>The reseach, published today in the <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> (<em>PNAS</em>), is the largest study of theory of mind to date.</p>&#13; &#13; <p>A fundamental part of human social interaction and communication involves putting ourselves in other people鈥檚 shoes, to imagine another person鈥檚 thoughts and feelings. This is known as 鈥榯heory of mind鈥 or 鈥榗ognitive empathy鈥.</p>&#13; &#13; <p>For decades, researchers have studied the development of theory of mind, from infancy to old age. One of the most widely used tests with which to study theory of mind is the 鈥楻eading the Mind in the Eyes鈥 Test (or Eyes Test, for short), which asks participants to pick which word best describes what the person in the photo is thinking or feeling, just by viewing photos of the eye region of the face.</p>&#13; &#13; <p>The Eyes Test was first developed in 1997 by Professor Sir Simon Baron-Cohen and his research team at 国际米兰对阵科莫, and was revised in 2001, and has become a well-established assessment of theory of mind. It is listed as one of two recommended tests for measuring individual differences in 鈥楿nderstanding Mental States鈥 by the National Institute of Mental Health in the US.</p>&#13; &#13; <p>Over the decades, many independent research studies have found that females on average score higher than males on theory of mind tests. However, most of these studies were limited to relatively small samples, without much diversity in terms of geography, culture, and/or age. To address these shortcomings, a team of multidisciplinary researchers led by 国际米兰对阵科莫 University and with collaborators in Bar-Ilan, Harvard, Washington, and Haifa Universities, as well as IMT Lucca, has merged large samples from different online platforms to analyse data from 305,726 participants across 57 countries.</p>&#13; &#13; <p>The results showed that across the 57 countries, females on average scored significantly higher than males (in 36 countries), or similar to males (in 21 countries), on the Eyes Test. Importantly, there was no country where males on average scored significantly higher than females on the Eyes Test. The on-average sex difference was seen across the lifespan, from 16 to 70 years of age. The team also confirmed this on-average sex difference in three independent datasets and on non-English versions of the Eyes Test, spanning eight languages.</p>&#13; &#13; <p>Dr David M. Greenberg, the lead scientist on the study, a Zuckerman Scholar at Bar-Ilan and Honorary Research Associate at 国际米兰对阵科莫, said: 鈥淥ur results provide some of the first evidence that the well-known phenomenon 鈥 that females are on average more empathic than males 鈥 is present in wide range of countries across the globe. It鈥檚 only by using very large data sets that we can say this with confidence.鈥</p>&#13; &#13; <p>Although this study cannot discern the cause of this on-average sex difference, the authors discuss on the basis of prior research that this may be the result of both biological and social factors.</p>&#13; &#13; <p>Professor Sir Simon Baron-Cohen, Director of the Autism Research Centre at 国际米兰对阵科莫 University, and senior author on the study, said: 鈥淪tudies of on-average sex differences say nothing about an individual鈥檚 mind or aptitudes, since an individual may be typical or atypical for their sex. The Eyes Test reveals that many individuals struggle to read facial expressions, for a variety of reasons. Support should be available for those who seek it.鈥</p>&#13; &#13; <p>The researchers also showed that, in addition to sex, 鈥楧-scores鈥 (the difference between a person鈥檚 drive to systemize and their drive to empathize) are a significant negative predictor of scores on the Eyes Test. This adds to an earlier study led by Greenberg in 2018 of over 650,000 participants, also published in PNAS, which found that D-scores accounted for 19 times more of the variance in autistic traits than did sex or indeed any other demographic variable. Thus, D-scores appear to play a more important role than sex in aspects of human cognition.</p>&#13; &#13; <p>Dr Carrie Allison, Director of Applied Research at the Autism Research Centre at 国际米兰对阵科莫 University, and a member of the team, said: 鈥淭his study clearly demonstrates a largely consistent sex difference across countries, languages, and ages. This raises new questions for future research about the social and biological factors that may contribute to the observed on-average sex difference in cognitive empathy.鈥</p>&#13; &#13; <p><a href="http://www.yourbraintype.com">Take the 鈥楻eading the Mind in the Eyes鈥 Test</a></p>&#13; &#13; <p><em><strong>Reference</strong><br />&#13; Greenberg, D. M., Warrier, V., Abu-Akel, A., Allison, C., Gajos, K. Z., Reinecke, K., Rentfrow, P. J., Radecki, M. A., &amp; Baron-Cohen, S. (2022). <a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2022385119">Sex and age differences in 鈥榯heory of mind鈥 across 57 countries using the English version of the 鈥楻eading the Mind in the Eyes鈥 Test</a>. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences; 26 Dec 2022; DOI:聽10.1073/pnas.2022385119</em></p>&#13; </div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-content-summary field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><p>Females, on average, are better than males at putting themselves in others鈥 shoes and imagining what the other person is thinking or feeling, suggests a new study of over 300,000 people in 57 countries.</p>&#13; </p></div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-content-quote field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Our results provide some of the first evidence that the well-known phenomenon 鈥 that females are on average more empathic than males 鈥 is present in wide range of countries across the globe</div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-content-quote-name field-type-text field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">David Greenberg</div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-image-credit field-type-link-field field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><a href="https://unsplash.com/photos/women-hugging-each-other-paAaKl05ldM" target="_blank">Yuri Levin (Unsplash)</a></div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-image-desctiprion field-type-text field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Two women hugging</div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-cc-attribute-text field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width:0" /></a><br />&#13; The text in this work is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>. Images, including our videos, are Copyright 漏国际米兰对阵科莫 and licensors/contributors as identified.聽 All rights reserved. We make our image and video content available in a number of ways 鈥 as here, on our <a href="/">main website</a> under its <a href="/about-this-site/terms-and-conditions">Terms and conditions</a>, and on a <a href="/about-this-site/connect-with-us">range of channels including social media</a> that permit your use and sharing of our content under their respective Terms.</p>&#13; </div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-show-cc-text field-type-list-boolean field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Yes</div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-license-type field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above"><div class="field-label">Licence type:&nbsp;</div><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><a href="/taxonomy/imagecredit/public-domain">Public Domain</a></div></div></div> Mon, 26 Dec 2022 21:00:32 +0000 cjb250 236231 at